Converting Investment Property to Your Primary Residence

Converting Investment Property to Your Primary Residence

Exclusion of Gain from Sale of Residence

Many people are aware that they can sell their primary residence and not pay taxes on a significant amount of gain.  Under Section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code, you will not owe capital gains taxes on up to $250,000 of gain, or $500,000 of gain if you are married and filing jointly, when you sell a home that you used as your primary residence for at least two of the previous five years. Taxpayers can take advantage of this exclusion once every two years.

 

Property Converted from Investment to Primary Residence

 

Taxpayers used to be able to trade into a rental, rent the home for a while, move into it and then exclude all or some of the gain under Section 121.  Provided they lived in the home as their primary residence for at least two years, they could sell it and exclude the gain under Section 121 up to the maximum level of $250,000/$500,000.  In recent years Congress enacted two amendments to Section 121 in order to limit the benefits of Section 121 when the property has been used as a rental.

First, if you acquire property in a 1031 exchange and then convert it to your primary residence, you must own it at least five years before being eligible for the Section 121 exclusion.

Second, the amount of gain that you can exclude will be reduced to the extent that the house was used for something other than a primary residence during the period of ownership.  The exclusion is reduced pro rata by comparing the number of years the property is used for non-primary residence purposes to the total number of years the property is owned by the taxpayer. For example, a married couple uses a tax deferred exchange under Section 1031 to acquire a house as investment property.  The couple rents the house for three years, and then moves into it and uses it as their primary residence for the next three years.  The couple sells the property at the end of year 6, netting a total gain of $800,000.  Instead of being able to exclude $500,000, the couple will not be able to exclude some of the gain based on how many years they rented the house.  Since they rented it for three years out of six, 50% of the gain, or $400,000, will not be able to be excluded.  Because of this new limitation, the couple will be able to exclude $400,000 of the gain rather than $500,000.

Exceptions

There are a couple of exceptions to this restriction.  If the house was used as a rental prior to January 1, 2009, the exclusion is not affected.  Using the example provided above, if the three year rental period occurred prior to January 1, 2009, the exclusion would not be reduced and the couple would be able to exclude the full $500,000. Another important exception is that property that is firstused as a primary residence and later converted to investment property is not affected by these restrictions on excluding gain.  For example, if you own and live in a house for 18 years and then you move out and rent the house for two years before selling it, you can receive the full amount of the exclusion.  Because your investment use occurred after the last day of use as a primary residence, all of the gain accumulated over your 20 year ownership of the property can be excluded, up to $250,000, or $500,000 for married couples.

 

Combining Exclusion with 1031 Exchange

Fortunately, the rules are favorable to taxpayers who have more than $250,000/$500,000 of gain and are looking to combine Section 1031 with Section 121 to both exclude and defer tax.  When the property starts out as a primary residence and then is converted into an investment property, you can exclude gain under Section 121, and then defer tax on the remaining gain, provided you comply with the requirements of both Section 1031 and Section 121. The Internal Revenue Code still provides investors with favorable options for exclusion of gain and tax deferral.  The rules can be complicated, but with the right planning taxpayers can still make the most of their real estate investments.  For additional information about the 1031 exchange process or to open an exchange contact us at First American Exchange. References:   Internal Revenue Code §121; Housing Assistance Tax Act of 2008 (H.R. 3221).

Why Mortgage Lending is so tight in 2012

Gold Repository

Fort Knox Bullion Depository

 

 

 

Why Mortage Lending is so tight in 2012.  This is a song that many realtors/loan officers and buyers are singing daily.  Sometimes the buyers state that getting a home mortgage is like taking a shopping spree at Fort Knox.

The housing market continues to struggle as Realtors report one in three contracts now fail, up nearly 10 percent from the year prior and now the top challenge of the housing industry. Failures are due to declined mortgage applications or failed underwriting as appraised values are coming in below the negotiated price, according to the National Association of Realtors.

But why is mortgage lending so tight? Why are banks making things so difficult? It seems that now, more than ever, contract failures is the last thing the housing sector needs.

In a recent unsolicited and unplanned letter from the Federal Reserve chairman to Congress suggested that the housing market has the potential to be fixed and while Republican Senator Hatch publicly asserted that Bernanke was stepping out of bounds by influencing policy, the letter explained in detail why lending is so tight.

In the letter, the Fed notes, “Other data show, for instance, that less than half of lenders are currently offering mortgages to borrowers with a FICO score above 620 and a down payment of 10 percent – even though these loans are within GSE parameters. This hesitancy on the part of lenders is due in part to concerns about the high cost of servicing in the event of loan delinquency and fear that the GSEs could force the lender to repurchase the loan if the borrower defaults in the future.”

The Texas Real Estate Center (RECON) explains that the Fed asserts concerns about the high cost of mortgage servicing stem from:

  • the realization of how expensive it is to resolve a nonperforming loan,
  • uncertainty about what it will cost to comply with new mortgage servicing-related regulations and
  • the potential change in the way Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs) are treated for capital requirements under Basel III (new international banking regulations).

RECON analyst, Gerald Klassen writes, “The good news is that we can understand the reasons. The bad news is that self-preservation may prevent the problem from being fixed.”

Klassen notes recent reports that it costs a servicer 75 basis points or more to service a defaulted loan compared with the 25 basis point servicing fee it receives, making it a losing business.

FHA loans are also difficult to obtain, with various factions, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development calling for a loosening of credit score minimums. According to the Asset Securitization Report, “Lenders are telling HUD officials the agency must first change FHA’s lender/monitoring system known as Neighborhood Watch so they aren’t stigmatized for making loans to borrowers with lower credit scores.” Lenders with higher default rates will have higher Neighborhood Watch ratios than other which RECON says could lead to audits and indemnification demands.

“Don’t forget to add the risk of government and private lawsuits and judicial foreclosure proceedings to the list of concerns about making loans that are more likely to default,” Klassen says. “If you were a lender facing all these challenges, would you make the loan? Demonization of mortgage lenders and servicers makes for great political theatrics. But it doesn’t want them to lend more.

This article is a reprint from AG Beat. Author is Tara Steele.

Notice of Fire Prevention Fee for Homeowners

Burning Home

San Diego Home on Fire

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notice of Fire Prevention Fee: The Governor signed AB 29 of the First Extraordinary Session (ABX1 29) into law on July 7, 2011. ABX1 29 imposes a $150 annual wildfire protection fee per habitable structure for property owners in the SRA. SRA lands cover about 31 million acres in 56 counties, and include an estimated 1.1 million to 1.5 million individual parcels, and approximately 800,000 habitable structures. Public Resources Code Section 4210 provides a legislative finding and declaration that the presence of structures within the SRA can pose an increased risk of fire ignition and an increased potential for fire damage within the state’s wildlands and watersheds and that the costs of fire prevention activities should be borne by the owners of these structures.

The State Board of Equalization (BOE) is required to annually assess and collect the fee from property owners on behalf of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) in accordance with the Fee Collection Procedures Law. CDF is responsible for providing the BOE with a list of property owners who are liable for the fire prevention fee, and the amount to be assessed. However, the BOE is currently waiting to receive funding from the State of California in order to begin its collection duties, so the BOE has not yet finalized its method for the billing procedure of the Fire Prevention Fee.

There’s more to a mortgage refinance than lowering your monthly payments

 

There’s more to a mortgage refinance than lowering your monthly payments.

1. Change your mortgage term

If you decrease the term of your mortgage in a refinance by going from a 30-year to a 15-year, you’ll pay a lower interest rate and shorten your total interest costs. You’ll build home equity more quickly, and pay off your loan sooner, even though your monthly payments go up.

2. Move from an adjustable rate to a fixed rate

ARMs offer low introductory rates, but they also offer long periods of uncertainty that make it hard to budget. It makes sense in a mortgage refinance to go from an ARM to a fixed-rate loan during a low-interest rate environment. You’ll get emotional security and your rate won’t fluctuate with changing economic conditions.

3. Take out cash

With a cash-out mortgage refinance, you can turn an intangible asset—accumulated home equity—into a tangible one—cash. It makes sense for a project that will generate long-term benefits, like a home improvement or funding a child’s college education. However, don’t do it for frivolous reasons. Unless you’re extremely disciplined, you could find yourself in even deeper debt.

4. Consolidate two mortgages

When interest rates are low, a mortgage refinance lets you consolidate your main mortgage and an outstanding home equity loan to realize a lower overall monthly payment. Plus, you’ll have only one mortgage payment to make each month.

5. Recover from divorce

If your home is jointly owned with your soon-to-be ex-spouse, a mortgage refinance will turn a joint obligation into the responsibility of the person keeping the home. Nothing is more frustrating than tracking down a former spouse who doesn’t keep up with his or her end of the mortgage payment.

Lay the groundwork

If one of these reasons resonates with you, contact your current lender to see if it’ll offer you preferred rates or reduced closing costs on a mortgage refinance. But don’t assume the current lender is best: Leave no stone unturned by searching for lenders online and calling community banks and local credit unions.

No matter which lender you choose, a mortgage refinance for the right reasons can save you lots of money—and that’s the best reason of all.

By: Barbara Eisner Bayer Compliments of NAR

How does a San Diego homeowner lower their energy bills & increase the home’s sales appeal?

Gas Utility Cost in San Diego

Lowering your Energy Bill as a San Diego Homeowner:

1.  How does a San Diego homeowner lower their energy bill and increase the homes sales appeal? 2.  How does a San Diego homeowner enjoy a safer and more comfortable and durable home? 3.  How does a San Diego homeowner reduce their impact on the enviroment? 4.  How does a San Diego homeowner increase the appriasal value of their investment? The answer to these questions and more can be found by investigation green living concepts on the web, installing solar, monitor your utility uses  and follow the suggestions contained within the revised HERS booklet.

The California Energy Commission just released an updated 2011 Home Energy Rating Services (HERS) booklet with the following changes for all San Diego Homeowners:

The 2011 updated edition of the HERS Booklet: What Is Your Home Energy Rating? is a colorful and informative publication created by the California Energy Commission to

  • Describe Whole-House Home Energy Rating services and their benefits, and how to find a certified professional HERS Rater.
  • Provide home buyers, sellers, brokers, and appraisers with information about the opportunity to invest in energy efficiency improvements at the time-of-sale.
  • Explain the desirability of obtaining utility bills from the seller.
  • Identify the potential of adding sales appeal and value to your home through energy efficiency upgrades.
  • Offer options for financing energy efficiency improvements and explain where to find tax credit and rebate information.

Get your copy of the updated 2011 Home Energy Rating Services (HERS) booklet for all San Diego Homeowners by downloading the appropriate version below.

Click here to download and print the color version. Click here to download and print the black and white version.

Test